When did you first learn
about the PSSC?
I
kept hearing my mentor Bill Layton talking about the PSSC as a series of films
and then later, a collection of labs that were really good. When Bill and I
talk, we often make references to the source of an idea or teaching technique
or lab, or even the physics argument that justifies a point. Over time, he kept
referencing the PSSC. Finally, I asked him what it stood for.
What is the PSSC?
The
Physical Science Study Committee.
After
Sputnik, the American government decided it wanted to invest in its citizens’
knowledge in the physical sciences so that we could produce a generation that
would close the science gap. The committee was formed to improve science
education in America. As you probably already know, for many people, the
science community included, Sputnik was a wake-up call, because the Russians
sent the satellite into space before the Americans did.
In
1956, the PSSC was funded by the National Science Foundation, Henry Ford, and
Alfred P. Sloan. Scientists and science educators from MIT and Cornell, among
others, worked together to create a textbook, lab manual and resource for
teachers, and also a series of films. At the time this program was implemented,
my college Bill Layton, a professor at UCLA (retired), was teaching in Los
Angeles and he used the PSSC curriculum in his classrooms. In his class, the
lights would go off and the latest PSSC film would turn on.
How did the PSSC curriculum
and resources make a difference for physics education in America?
Before
this book, physics in schools was mostly about fixing a car and home maintenance
repairs and sometimes, engineering. However, the PSSC gave physics educators
set quality standards by introducing the modern subject matter of topics we
teach today. Classical mechanics, as opposed to practical mechanics, started to
be taught according to this program. Another example: the modern treatment of
the atomic structure of matter.
Try your hand at one of the problems!
One
of the contributions of the PSSC that I find most interesting is the
justification of a concept by experimental evidence. Students learned about
experiments that can be performed or performed the actual experiment that illustrates
a physics concept.
For
example, when the textbook discussed electric fields, and while many books have
similar diagrams (see above), this textbook raised the bar.
Beside the diagram, on the
facing page, photographs of electric fields are included (see above an image from the textbook). These electric fields
were created by electrocuting grass seeds in oil. I did a similar experiment
with lettuce seeds in vegetable oil on this video. Encouraged by the pictures I had seen in books, I created this electric field demonstrator.
Want to Learn More?
PSSC Films
Link
to a PSSC film about Coulomb’s Law downloaded from archive.org
At
this website, where I have compiled collection of physics videos (aptly named physicsvideos.net) you can find “Frames of Reference,” one of the most well-known
films produced by the PSSC.
Great post. This article is really very interesting and enjoyable. I think its must be helpful and informative for us. Thanks for sharing your nice post about Contributions of the Physical Science Study Committee .
ReplyDeletelive football scores
I am trying to locate the original version of the Centripetal Force lab that was part of the PSSC program. Hopefully it is archived somewhere that I can access it on line, but so far no luck.
ReplyDeleteYou mean this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUVcHgXvIxI
DeleteWe used a version of this book in 1972 and 1973 (from memory), at Korumburra High School, Australia. Throughout the book there are a number of black and white photos of experiments made involving ice pucks, the book uses them extensively. I was always slightly mystified and slightly alienated by this, I had never seen a real ice puck, I had only seen real snow about once when we made a special school excursion to Mt Donna Buang, and here were these black and white photos of ice pucks as though they were the most normal thing in the world. It just shows that even among the English speaking community this book was not culturally sensitive and appropriate to an Australian schoolboy. (OK, I'm being slightly tongue-in-cheek).
ReplyDelete